Cit vs hindustan bulk carriers

Author: wwzy

August undefined, 2024

WebAug 12, 2024 · The Supreme Court laid down the principles of Rule of harmonious construction in the case of CIT vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers:- 1. The courts must avoid a head on clash of seemingly contradicting provisions and they must construe the contradictory provisions so as to harmonize them. Web1 CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, (2003) 3 SCC 57, p. 74. 2) The provision of one section cannot be used to defeat the provision contained in another unless the court, despite all its effort, is unable to find a way to reconcile their differences.2 3) When it is impossible to completely reconcile the differences in contradictory provisions, the ...

CIT v/s M/s. Hindustan Bulk Carriers - LawyerServices

WebCIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers (2003)3 SCC 57 the Supreme Court laid down five principles of rule of harmonious construction:- The courts must avoid a head-on clash of … WebOct 8, 2002 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers: Court: SUPREME COURT: Relevant Act: Income-tax: Date of Order: 08/10/2002 : Judgment: View Judgment: Keyword Tags: … campgrounds around lake placid

Protection against ex-post facto law in India : its pros & cons

WebJun 2, 2011 · The Hon’ble Supreme Court had in the case of CIT vs. Damani Brothers 259 ITR 475 and CIT vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers 259 ITR 449 held that interest u/ss. 234A, 234B and 234C is mandatory and the Settlement Commission had no power to reduce or waive such interest. In view of these decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court which were … WebJun 25, 2024 · The Supreme Court laid down following rules of harmonious construction in the case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers [7] :- The courts must avoid a head on clash of seemingly contradicting provisions and they must construe the contradictory provisions so as to harmonize them Web3 CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers 2003 TAXLR 102. Jus Corpus Law Journal (JCLJ) www.juscorpus.com VOL. 1 ISSUE 1 180 4. Courts must also bear in mind that harmonious construction is not an understanding that reduces one clause to useless numbers or dead. 5. Harmonization is not the dissolution or making of any constitutional provision first time in hawaii game

1 CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, (2003) 3 SCC 57, P. 74

Welspun Corp Ltd, Mumbai vs Dcit Cen Cir 22, Mumbai on 25 …

WebIn CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, the supreme court stated five important principles and they are: The courts must avoid a conflict between conflicting provisions by construing the opposing clauses in a way that harmonises them. WebDec 17, 2002 · CIT v/s M/s. Hindustan Bulk Carriers C.A.No.7966 - 67 of 1996 Decided On, 17 December 2002 At, Supreme Court of India By, THE HONOURABLE MR. … first time in hawaii campgrounds around springfield il

"Webof Income Tax vs. Hindustan Bulk Carrier, the application can be seen in several landmark judgements before that, both pre – independence and post – independence. Several judgements have applied these principles implicitly and the same is reflected in their interpretation of legislations while adjudicating disputes. 1. Venkataramana Devaru v. " - Cit vs hindustan bulk carriers

Cit vs hindustan bulk carriers

Welspun Corp Ltd, Mumbai vs Dcit Cen Cir 22, Mumbai on 25 …

WebFeb 6, 2024 · Explaining this principle, Hon’ble Supreme Court has, in the case of CIT Vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers [(2003) 259 ITR 449 (SC)], has observed that “A construction which reduces the statute to a futility has to be avoided” and that “A statute or any enacting provision therein must be so construed as to make it effective and operative on ... WebFeb 6, 2024 · The Supreme Court laid down five principles of rule of Harmonious Construction in the landmark case of CIT v Hindustan Bulk Carriers: The courts must …

Did you know?

WebJun 19, 2015 · The A.O., however, referred to Apex Court judgment in case of CIT vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers and charged interest. 5. The assessee preferred an appeal to CIT(A) and it was held that the interest could not be levied in block assessment by placing reference to section 158BF of the Act. Apex Court judgment in case of CIT vs. … WebSep 15, 2024 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers (2003) 259 ITR 449 (SC) and CIT Vs. Demani Brothers (2003) 259 ITR 475 (SC). It is stated that interest under Section 234B is to be …

WebAug 30, 2024 · In the landmark case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers (2003) the supreme court laid down five principles of rule of harmonious construction: The courts … WebDec 17, 2002 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers Arijit Pasayat, J.— A question of seminal importance relating to the period for which interest in terms of Section 234-B of the …

WebCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S Hindustan Bulk Carriers, M/S Damani Brothers [2002] Insc 559 (17 December 2002) M.B. Shah Shah, J. Appeal (civil) 7248 of 1999 . I … http://www.ijlljs.in/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Harmonious-Construction.pdf

WebJun 28, 2012 · That is clearly an absurdity. As to what should be done in such a situation, we find guidance from the observations made by Honble Supreme Court, in the case CIT vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers Ltd (259 ITR 449), as follows: …

WebJan 24, 2024 · In the case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers 2003, 5 guidelines focusing rule of harmonious construction have been directed by Supreme Court of India. Doctrine of Eclipse. ... In the case of Rattan Lal vs. State of Punjab AIR 1965 SC 444, on 31-May-1962, ‘A’ boy of 16yr found guilty of an offence and was awarded imprisonment of 6 months ... first time in india logoWebNov 6, 2024 · As observed by Hon‟ble Supreme Court, in the case of CIT Vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers [(2003) 259 ITR 449 (SC)], “A construction which reduces the statute to a futility has to be avoided. A statute or any enacting provision therein must be so construed as to make it effective and operative on the principle expressed in maxim us res magi’s ... first time in belizeWebDec 26, 2024 · Principles :- The Supreme Court laid down five principles of rule of Harmonious Construction in the landmark case of CIT vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers. 1. The Courts must avoid a head-on clash of seemingly contradicting provisions and they must construe the contradictory provisions so as to harmonize them. 2. The provision of one … first time in italy itineraryWebAug 15, 2015 · Sathe has appeared in a number of landmark matters in the Supreme Court and the High Courts such as CIT vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers (2002) 258 ITR 399 (SC), CIT vs. Gabriel India Ltd (1989) 179 ITR 54 (Bom), CIT vs. LIC Housing Finance Ltd (2014) 367 ITR 458 (Bom) etc. He was designated Senior Advocate on 23.07.2005 and was … first time in irelandWebDec 21, 2024 · Hindustan Bulk Carrier: “While interpreting, the court has a duty to avoid a “head-on clash” at all costs between two sections of the same act The interpretation should be done such that the provision of one section doesn’t defeat the purpose of another unless it is impossible to effect a reconciliation between them. campgrounds around zanesville ohioWebOct 8, 2002 · Commissioner of Income Tax v/s Hindustan Bulk Carriers Civil Appeal Nos. 7966-67 of 1996 Decided On, 08 October 2002 At, Supreme Court of India By, THE … first time in europe where to goWebOct 11, 2024 · CIT vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers … but can waive or reduce interest u/s 220(2A) if prescribed conditions are satisfied. Rectification of order: section 245D(6B): Within a period of 6 months from the end of month in which order was passed; campgrounds around smith mountain lake